From xpolakis@otenet.gr Fri Feb 26 17:28:17 1999 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.2+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA44568 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:28:16 -0800 Received: from athserv.otenet.gr (athserv.otenet.gr [195.170.0.1]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id RAA12391 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:28:14 -0800 Received: from [195.167.119.64] (athe530-a064.otenet.gr [195.167.119.64]) by athserv.otenet.gr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA14944 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 03:28:09 +0200 (EET) X-Sender: xpolakis@mail.otenet.gr Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 03:31:16 +0200 To: classics@u.washington.edu From: xpolakis@otenet.gr (Antreas P. Hatzipolakis) Subject: Re: professional generalizatons Lisa Auanger wrote: >Over the years I've encountered a few generalizations about the >profession. Some that spring to mind are: > >A true Classicist is always looking for the right word. > >Archaeologists always begin with a map. > >An archaeologist must have an answer for everything (this one from >J. Beazley, I think) > >Would others care to add to the list? The easy way to identify a mathematician is by the common use of the phrases "It can be shown that..." and "Is left as an exercise to the student..." More at: http://www.isr.umd.edu/~jasonp/school > >Lisa Auanger (who does not believe she was the one who started the >parenthetical addendum thing) APH .