From vedwards@u.washington.edu Fri Mar 19 13:48:54 1999 Received: from jason04.u.washington.edu (root@jason04.u.washington.edu [140.142.78.5]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA27380 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:48:53 -0800 Received: from homer12.u.washington.edu (vedwards@homer12.u.washington.edu [140.142.78.13]) by jason04.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA49694 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:48:52 -0800 Received: from localhost (vedwards@localhost) by homer12.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id NAA15370 for ; Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:48:50 -0800 Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 13:48:50 -0800 (PST) From: Virjean Edwards To: Discussion of Residency Issues State Wide Subject: Re: Kids preceding family In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII That's a tough one Joe! Didn't they change anything over to Washington while they were here? When did they actually say they were leaving their jobs in California? What kind of documentation do they have to show the problems they were having in California? I realize I am not being very helpful, but I would want to take a look at these factors before deciding. On the other hand, they did not live here for 12 months, so January it is! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Virjean H. Edwards University of Washington Assistant Registrar Office of the Registrar Residency Officer 264 Schmitz Hall, Box 355850 (206)543-3290 Seattle WA 98195-5850 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On Fri, 19 Mar 1999, Joseph M. St.Hilaire wrote: > Last summer this family from California visited me to inquire about > residency. It was their plan to move up here by September. Their two > daughters were accepted at Western and came up ahead of the parents to > enroll Fall Quarter, and they have been paying non-res tuition. > > Well, they had trouble selling the house and one thing after another > delayed their arrival in Wa. until January. The mother was in here this > morning, pleading that I consider September as the family's date of > declaration of intent to become Wa residents. I said that the first > principle of becoming a resident is physical presence and since we're > looking at dependent students whose parents were non-residents until > January, the daughters aren't eligible until Winter 2000. She's making > the point, however, that they enrolled the daughters here in Fall in > anticipation of the family's move and that we should regard Sept as the > clock-ticking date. > > What would you say in response to her argument? > > Joe St.Hilaire > Western > > .