From jules2db@cox.net Wed Apr 30 14:05:34 2003 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW03.04/8.12.1+UW03.02) with ESMTP id h3UL5X1M061944 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:05:33 -0700 Received: from fed1mtao01.cox.net (fed1mtao01.cox.net [68.6.19.244]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW03.04/8.12.1+UW03.02) with ESMTP id h3UL5VOp011456 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:05:32 -0700 Received: from juliescomputer ([68.107.63.209]) by fed1mtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with SMTP id <20030430210528.RLIL22750.fed1mtao01.cox.net@juliescomputer> for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:05:28 -0400 Message-ID: <00ee01c30f5d$3915a1c0$6401a8c0@sd.cox.net> From: "Julie Brennan" To: References: <20030430195110.67287.qmail@web13509.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: TAN: Mendel and genetics reading resources Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:12:35 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Thanks for all the comments. On Gould, Darwins' Black Box by Behe has some discussion of problems with his ideas, and points out the lack of science to support his arguments. I'm finding as I look into this, particularly the historical perspective, how more theory is still built into various arguments than I realized. I apologize for the TAN nature of the request, I thought it might slip in there as I was looking at the topic more from the historical perspective, which I find more interesting than the current nuts and bolts of the science. Julie .