From rgairola@u.washington.edu Mon Aug 19 18:31:03 2002 Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g7K1V2eY094528 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:31:02 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 19 18:31:01 2002 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with ESMTP id g7K1V1br024609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:31:01 -0700 Received: from mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.17]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.06) with SMTP id g7K1V1R6029517 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:31:01 -0700 Received: FROM hymn06.u.washington.edu BY mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu ; Mon Aug 19 18:31:00 2002 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn06.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g7K1UxLO026723 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:30:59 -0700 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:30:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Rahul Gairola To: Transnational Studies Group Subject: Re: lowe, etc. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Hey all: Todd, all this sounds just great and I am happy Ji and Brian are on board. I can't wait to see what we all come up with the intersections of these projects! Should be loads of fun, which I am really looking forward to. Also, I think Rowe, Sharp and/or Pratt are excellent choices. If we want we can keep the other "biggies" in the back of our minds and see what happens. After all, if our series is sucessful, we might be able to invite bigger people. But for now, I think these three options are not only doable, but also far more practical with more appeal not just to both the trans am stds groups, but also to the particular pool of students we currently have. Bless Brandy's little heart! She is right, though. All of us have been supportive of this group, American Studies and also MELUS. We DO deserve to have dinner and re-connect before the term flings us into chaos. May I be the coordinator of this? If you guys prefer, I'll be happy to have you all at my studio on Capitol Hill for some homemade chicken curry with rice and red wine. We might relax and catch up there, and this might also save $$$. If not, let's go to a decent priced restaurant in the ID or CD -- both have great East Asian and African food. Let me know what your thoughts are folks. About Lowe: my personal preference steers away from the syllabus idea towards an enagement with her current interests in Asian American studies and the links she might make between globalization and immigration/ the "War on Terrorism." Perhaps we should wait until that meeting of both groups to decide? Also, I just want to say: I am truly impressed with the work we have dedicated ourselves to and am so proud of all of you! Seriously, at the risk of sounding like a dad, I can feel that some truly amazing things are taking place here and am so happy to be a part of them. You guys have all really helped me re-think the very paradigms through which I apprehend my own interests, and this is valuable to me. Great job, and thanks so much Todd for being a fun and erudite captain (DAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRR matey!!) Be well folks, Rahul ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Rahul Krishna Gairola Department of English Office: Padelford B25C University of Washington Hours: T, Th 2:30-4pm Seattle, WA 98195-4330/ USA Phone: (206) 685-8960 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, todd f tietchen wrote: > > Hey all...I have yet to finalize dates with Lisa Lowe and the Simpson > Center--the dates I'm trying for are 1/30 (talk) and 1/31 (workshop). > I'll let you know as soon as this is finalized. Once that is definite, > we'll talk about a meeting date for all of us with the Simpson Center. > > I had an e-mail exchange with Brandy over the weekend in which she > encouraged us to explore/consider whomever we wish, and to not be "afraid > of stepping on anyone's toes." She thought our tentative list was great. > I've also had conversations with Ji and Brian Zindel, who are both going to > be on the conference committee for next year (we'll be opening it up to > other students at an october meeting but these appear to be the core > people). Ji and Brian were also pleased with the list. The precedent in > the American Studies Colloquium has been that the conference committee > compiles a list of possible keynotes--so the best way to handle this > collaboration between groups would be to have both groups meet > at the beginning of the quarter and compile (our add to the existing) list > together. Brandy also thought it important to remind us all that while we > are part of the "trans group," most of us have also actively participated > in American Studies events and projects over the last couple of years--we > also have a say in this point about the colloquium. > > That said, I've been thinkning about the lsit we put together, and my > preferred three (Todd's trinity) would be Rowe, Sharpe or Pratt. I'll put > forward arguments justifying any of these names if need be, but I'd rather > hear what the rest of you have to say at this point. These three are listed > in no particular order. > > Finally, I'm not satisfied that we came to an agreement on what we expect > from Lisa Lowe at the workshop. I don't think it's enought to ask her to > come and talk about a syllabus for an hour or so. We need to be more > specific about what our expectations are. For example, do we expect that > she talk about what set of ideas or critical questions we need to have in > mind when assembling a set of texts--irregardless of periodization--in the > context of the transnational moment? Would we like her to discuss the > ways in which transnationalization forces us to redefine/complexify our > current definitions of, or approaches to, "culture" (literature included), > thus making interdisciplinarity or transdisciplinarity (somehow) a more > necessary tactic of cultural critique? I guess I 'm just trying to > assemble a list of questions that she (and the other speaker) might > consider in conducting the workshop, without rigidly reproducing the > issues raised in our grant proposal. So what issues would you like to > hear her talk about in relation to here syllabus? > > Let me know what you think about these issues. Regards--Todd > ______________________________________________________________________________ > Todd F. Tietchen > Department of English > University of Washington > Seattle, WA 98195-4330 > > > .