From jmpfund@bgnet.bgsu.edu Sun May 20 21:10:45 2001
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f4L4Ai0108184
	for <classics@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sun, 20 May 2001 21:10:44 -0700
Received: from smtp02.bgsu.edu (smtp02.bgsu.edu [129.1.5.18])
	by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f4L4AhK18101
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sun, 20 May 2001 21:10:44 -0700
Received: from [129.1.190.141] (tc1-141.dialup.bgsu.edu [129.1.190.141])
	by smtp02.bgsu.edu (Switch-2.1.0/Switch-2.1.0) with ESMTP id f4L4Afs05770
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 21 May 2001 00:10:42 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: jmpfund@mailstore.bgsu.edu
Message-Id: <a04330100b72e44b79372@[129.1.190.43]>
In-Reply-To: <d1.6d261c3.2839a9f3@aol.com>
References: <d1.6d261c3.2839a9f3@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 00:10:42 -0400
To: classics@u.washington.edu
From: "James M. Pfundstein" <jmpfund@bgnet.bgsu.edu>
Subject: Re: leap day
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

At 7:14 PM -0400 5/20/01, AllenAmet@aol.com wrote:
>
>   i will assume this is a typo for 445? Or does "confusion" still reign?  ;-)

In my brain it's never absent. Thanks for the correction.

>
>   The "42 BC leap year" was already based on the errant 3-year model.

I don't see you you get there. If 46 counts as a bissextile year, the 
fourth year (counting inclusively: 46, 45, 44, 43) is 43 BC.

JMP
.