From galya@u.washington.edu Tue Jan 31 10:19:26 PST 1995
>From galya@u.washington.edu  Tue Jan 31 10:19:25 1995
Return-Path: <galya@u.washington.edu>
Received: from carson-oms2.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW94.10/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA04470;
	Tue, 31 Jan 95 10:19:25 -0800
Received: from carson.u.washington.edu by carson-oms2.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW94.10/UW-NDC Revision: 2.32 ) id AA24660;
	Tue, 31 Jan 95 10:19:25 -0800
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 1995 10:19:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Galya Diment <galya@u.washington.edu>
To: slavic-uw@u.washington.edu
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <slavic-uw@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Administration vs. Legislature
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91c.950131093852.9300D-100000@homer21.u.washington.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.PTX.3.91a.950131101258.6081D-100000@carson.u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Charlotte,

	The unfortunate truth is, the raise of tuition will, in all 
likelihood, not benefit us anyway. They will definitely find other 
things to spend the additional money on, and Gerberding stated at least 
twice that he would still go ahead and eliminate most of the programs on 
the list. Before we advocate any raises in tuition we should ask for 
guarantees from the university that at least some of this money will be 
used to support us and other similar programs. Otherwise our students 
will end up losing twice -- there won't be a Slavic department and they will 
pay more money for much inferior education. 

Galya

On Tue, 31 Jan 1995, Charlotte Wallace wrote:

> Unfortunately (?) I am one of those who believe that higher tuition would 
> support the quality of this institution, particularly the humanities, 
> which may not be money-getters, but frankly could be getting more money 
> through grants for instance than we are getting now.
> 
> -Charlotte
> 
> Charlotte Wallace
> Slavic Department, DP-32
> University of Washington
> Seattle, WA 98195
> 206-543-6848
> 
> 
.