From lwaller@sph.emory.edu Wed Aug 25 10:16:25 1999 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id KAA11386 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:16:24 -0700 Received: from viper.sph.emory.edu (viper.sph.emory.edu [170.140.4.1]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.06) with ESMTP id KAA05962 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 10:16:21 -0700 Received: from sph.emory.edu (squid.sph.emory.edu [170.140.4.9]) by viper.sph.emory.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13058 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:16:17 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lwaller@sph.emory.edu Message-ID: <37C424DC.AD928856@sph.emory.edu> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 13:16:12 -0400 From: Lance Waller X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: waphgis@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: disease rates References: <37C41DDA.BC02EEFA@isu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Karen: Here are some of the references: Clayton, D.G. and Bernardinelli, L. (1992). Bayesian methods for mapping disease risk. In Geographical and Environmental Epidemiology: Methods for Small-Area Studies, P. Elliott, J. Cuzick, D. English, and R. Stern, eds. London: Oxford University Press. \item Devine, O.J., Louis, T.A., and Halloran, M.E. (1994). Empirical Bayes estimators for spatially correlated incidence rates. Environmetrics, 5, 381--398. Devine, Owen J., Louis, Thomas A., Halloran, M. Elizabeth (1994). Empirical Bayes methods for stabilizing incidence rates before mapping Epidemiology, VOLUME = 5, PAGES = 622-630 Devine, Owen J., Louis, Thomas A. (1994) A constrained empirical Bayes estimator for incidence rates in areas with small populations. Statistics in Medicine. 13, 1119-1133. Lance Waller Karen Johnson wrote: > > A recent message listed a couple articles about estimating disease rates > using Bayesian methods ( I believe the authors were Devine, Louis, and > Halloran) - I seem to have misplaced the references. Does anyone have > these handy? > > Thanks .