From jfgannon@cloud9.net Sat May  3 06:06:41 2003
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.132])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW03.04/8.12.1+UW03.02) with ESMTP id h43D6f1M025012
	for <classics@reallists.u.washington.edu>; Sat, 3 May 2003 06:06:41 -0700
Received: from camomile.cloud9.net (camomile.cloud9.net [168.100.1.3])
	by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW03.04/8.12.1+UW03.02) with ESMTP id h43D6dOp011666
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sat, 3 May 2003 06:06:39 -0700
Received: from localhost.cloud9.net (localhost.cloud9.net [127.0.0.1])
	by camomile.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A175756
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sat,  3 May 2003 09:06:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from camomile.cloud9.net (localhost.cloud9.net [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.cloud9.net (VaMailArmor-2.0.1.7) id 12415-493F02C6;
	Sat, 03 May 2003 09:06:39 -0400
Received: from jfgannon (203-180.dialup.cloud9.net [168.100.203.180])
	by camomile.cloud9.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A91DD5744
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sat,  3 May 2003 09:06:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <004401c31175$20dff5a0$b4cb64a8@jfgannon>
From: "J.F. Gannon" <jfgannon@cloud9.net>
To: <classics@u.washington.edu>
References: <3EAB9247.7022AB82@sympatico.ca> <200304301101.17852.ms@gf.org> <008201c30f33$65feec20$6b3770c2@DESKTOP> <200304301222.17379.ms@gf.org>
Subject: Re: Not in the latest Explorator/mentivagrans
Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 09:08:45 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.7; VAE: 6.19.0.3; VDF: 6.19.0.10; host: camomile.cloud9.net)

Can it be that you are a Jacobite?

JFG

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael J. Smith" <ms@gf.org>
To: <classics@u.washington.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: Not in the latest Explorator/mentivagrans


> On Wednesday 30 April 2003 11:52, Ralph Hancock wrote:
> > Michael J. Smith cited 'How doth the little busy bee' as Isaac Watts's
> > worst poem. Watts could be a lot worse than that. Here are three stanzas
> > from A Hymn of Praise for Three Great Salvations, on the landing of
William
> > III in England in 1688.
> >
> > -----------
> >
> > But lo! the great Deliverer sails,
> >    Commision'd from Jehovah's hand,
> > And smiling seas, and wishing gales,
> >    Convey him to the longing land.
>
> Acknowledged. When he was bad, he was very, very bad. Of course
> William III is an even less propitious subject for poetry than
> the busy bee.
>
> --Michael J. Smith
>    ms@gf.org


.