From quantum@u.washington.edu Fri Oct 11 08:12:35 2002
Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with SMTP id g9BFCOFD072846
	for <uwracing@reallists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:12:28 -0700
Received: FROM mxu2.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Oct 11 08:12:23 2002 -0700
Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.19])
	by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with ESMTP id g9BFCNng022527
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <uwracing@lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:12:23 -0700
Received: from mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.17])
	by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with SMTP id g9BFCN7J026375
	for <uwracing@u.washington.edu>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:12:23 -0700
Received: FROM mailhost1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Oct 11 08:12:22 2002 -0700
Received: from [128.208.140.161] ([128.208.140.161])
	by mailhost1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with ESMTP id g9BFCMmT016060
	for <uwracing@u.washington.edu>; Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:12:22 -0700
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:12:22 -0700
Subject: Re: the big question
From: James Westphal <quantum@u.washington.edu>
To: <uwracing@u.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <B9CC3865.7256%quantum@u.washington.edu>
In-Reply-To: <F87CFDOphyiRbTD2bX800013bb3@hotmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
   boundary="MS_Mac_OE_3117168742_306213_MIME_Part"

> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

--MS_Mac_OE_3117168742_306213_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

You're asking if you're creating too much innuendo for the guys? Hmmm...

Well, I guess that it's not a completely impossible proposition...


From: "Carrie Eller" <cilvar@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: cilvar@hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:51:30 +0000
To: rs070700@u.washington.edu, nweise@u.washington.edu
Cc: uwracing@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: the big question

Don't forget to lather up with lotion, boys.  Nobody wants to see your
scaley legs.  I'm sure you all are intimately familiar with lotion-it's the
nature of the game when you are a male cyclist, but it's oh-so-nice on your
legs, too... 

        is that too much innuendo for the list???


--MS_Mac_OE_3117168742_306213_MIME_Part
Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: the big question</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
You're asking if you're creating too much innuendo for the guys? Hmmm...<BR=
>
<BR>
Well, I guess that it's not a completely impossible proposition...<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<B>From: </B>&quot;Carrie Eller&quot; &lt;cilvar@hotmail.com&gt;<BR>
<B>Reply-To: </B>cilvar@hotmail.com<BR>
<B>Date: </B>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:51:30 +0000<BR>
<B>To: </B>rs070700@u.washington.edu, nweise@u.washington.edu<BR>
<B>Cc: </B>uwracing@u.washington.edu<BR>
<B>Subject: </B>Re: the big question<BR>
<BR>
Don't forget to lather up with lotion, boys. &nbsp;Nobody wants to see your=
 scaley legs. &nbsp;I'm sure you all are intimately familiar with lotion-it'=
s the nature of the game when you are a male cyclist, but it's oh-so-nice on=
 your legs, too... <BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;is that too much in=
nuendo for the list???<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>


--MS_Mac_OE_3117168742_306213_MIME_Part--

.