From nathan@villasubrosa.com Sun Apr 8 10:22:09 2001 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.03) with ESMTP id f38HM8K08974 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 10:22:08 -0700 Received: from villasubrosa.com ([216.84.68.9]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.03) with SMTP id f38HMA721104 for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2001 10:22:11 -0700 Received: from villasubrosa.com ([216.84.68.78]) by villasubrosa.com ; Sun, 08 Apr 2001 13:26:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3AD09F82.5CE33084@villasubrosa.com> Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 13:27:31 -0400 From: Nathan Rose X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: classics@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Reception of Plato's Symposium References: <200104081231.IAA26774@mass-toolpike.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Does anyone know instances where Plato's Symposium has been portrayed as if > Aristophanes' speech were the meat, or doctrine of the dialogue? That is, > where someone says something like "Plato claimed that we were once merged with > somone else, and have been split apart..." I'm interested in all sorts of > occurences of this, in 'high', 'low' or any other level of culture. > WB Yeats, "Among School Children": Or else, to alter Plato's parable, Into the yolk and egg of the one shell. Nathan Rose .