From tesler@bcc.ctc.edu Mon May 11 15:39:32 1998 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP id PAA81998 for ; Mon, 11 May 1998 15:39:31 -0700 Received: from email1.bcc.ctc.edu (email1.bcc.ctc.edu [168.156.32.102]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP id PAA25071 for ; Mon, 11 May 1998 15:39:30 -0700 Received: by email1.bcc.ctc.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) id ; Mon, 11 May 1998 15:39:33 -0700 Message-ID: <205934FB3A2DD011BD1B08002BE60170016D858B@email1.bcc.ctc.edu> From: Tika Esler To: "'residency@u.washington.edu'" Subject: RE: Residency via resident parent Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 15:39:30 -0700 X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49) Content-Type: text/plain I agree with you, Joe, regarding the residency law. My guess is that the vehicle registration or driver license law NOR the sales tax law tie payment of resident tuition to the requirement that they be licensed in WA nor that they pay sales tax. That would be the ONLY way that these would be true, but stranger things have happened, maybe we should check those out! Tika A. Esler Associate Dean of Enrollment Services Bellevue Community College, Bellevue, WA tesler@bcc.ctc.edu (425) 641-2206 > ---------- > From: Joseph M. St.Hilaire[SMTP:saint@admsec.wwu.edu] > Reply To: residency@u.washington.edu > Sent: Monday, May 11, 1998 2:59 PM > To: Discussion of Residency Issues State Wide > Subject: Residency via resident parent > > I've had two cases in recent weeks involving students whom I've > classified > as residents because they have one resident parent (but live out of > state > with a non-res parent). > > The first one was stopped by a traffic cop, who somehow learned that > the > student was paying resident tuition. He told the student that he's > required to change his driver's license and vehicle registration > because > he is paying resident tuition. I subsequently spoke with the cop and > said > I didn't believe the law required the student to make the changes; it > only > says that a student who is a dependent and has a resident parent can > be > classified as a resident. > > The second case involved a student who purchased a car here, and in > the > transaction stated that he was not a resident and therefore was > exempted > from the sales tax of several hundred dollars. Later he was contacted > by > the department of revenue and was told that since he's paying resident > tuition he'd have to cough up the sales tax plus some heavy penalties > by > next week. Again, in my judgement, the student should not be treated > as a > resident for taxing purposes just because the law allows him to be > classified as a resident for tuition purposes. > > Comments? > > Joe St.Hilaire > Western > > .