From hancock@dircon.co.uk Sun Jul 29 17:55:10 2001
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f6U0t90126478
	for <classics@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 17:55:09 -0700
Received: from mailhost2.dircon.co.uk (mailhost2.dircon.co.uk [194.112.32.66])
	by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f6U0t8X26134
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Sun, 29 Jul 2001 17:55:08 -0700
Received: from main (th-en136-238.pool.dircon.co.uk [194.112.54.238])
	by mailhost2.dircon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA82968
	for <classics@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 01:55:05 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <00c901c11892$468ca9c0$a13470c2@main>
From: "Ralph Hancock" <hancock@dircon.co.uk>
To: <classics@u.washington.edu>
References: <000901c110b3$946ac460$58140dd0@t9q0o0>
Subject: Antioch OK in Word 2002
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 01:51:57 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

A few days ago Patrick Rourke asked whether Antioch worked properly in Word
2002. At this time I was not sure whether the converters worked properly. I
have just asked a friend who has Word 2002 to test them, and they did work
as they should have. So, to the best of my knowledge, the current version of
Antioch, 1.13a, is fully OK in Word 2002.

I apologise to any list members who don't have the faintest idea what I'm
talking about.

Ralph Hancock
hancock@dircon.co.uk
www.users.dircon.co.uk/~hancock/antioch.htm



.