From shardin@ctc.ctc.edu Tue Dec 1 16:16:17 1998 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP id QAA34652 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 16:16:17 -0800 Received: from ctc.ctc.edu (root@ctc.ctc.edu [134.39.2.118]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.1+UW98.09/8.9.1+UW98.09) with ESMTP id QAA09310 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 16:16:17 -0800 Received: from ctc.ctc.edu ([168.156.25.78] (may be forged)) by ctc.ctc.edu (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA15821 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 16:16:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36648688.849212C3@ctc.ctc.edu> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 16:15:04 -0800 From: Scott Hardin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: residency@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Residency Training References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Me too! I would like to attend such a session. Scott Hardin Highline Virjean Edwards wrote: > Hi All! > > I would have responded much sooner to this discussion, but I was away most > of November and just returned today. I will gladly host an INFORMAL > gathering of whomever wishes to meet, but I should probably take a poll > first to see how many would like to come. > > We have a large conference room on the 2nd floor of Schmitz Hall which > holds 25-30 comfortably, but no more than that. We could always put the > discussion on email afterwards to let the others know what we reviewed. > > By informal, I mean, no fees, no speakers. I will gladly lead the > discussion and do my best to maintain order--we all know how lively these > discussions can become! If we wanted to meet longer than the morning, the > Ave has plenty of restaurants so we could go our own way for lunch and > then return for a summing up session after lunch. > > I assume we are talking about a mid-January meeting? Let me know what you > think. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Virjean H. Edwards University of Washington > Assistant Registrar Office of the Registrar > Residency Officer 264 Schmitz Hall, Box 355850 > (206)543-3290 Seattle WA 98195-5850 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Joseph M. St.Hilaire wrote: > > > ***If it's true, as Janelle says, that the only difference (if the law is > > changed) will be in the 90-day vs. 12-month in-residence period, we may > > still have a lot in common. But I think it would be wise in any case to > > wait to see what happens with that bill in the legislature. Besides, I > > think we're making assumptions about the hospitality of Virjean and UW-- > > unless someone else centrally located wants to host it. > > > > Joe St.Hilaire > > Western > > > > On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Vicki Wheeler wrote: > > > > > Completely different residency laws for community colleges? If so, perhaps > > > it would be better to wait for the outcome. Do you know when that might be? > > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > From: Joseph M. St.Hilaire[SMTP:saint@admsec.wwu.edu] > > > > Reply To: residency@u.washington.edu > > > > Sent: Monday, November 30, 1998 11:28 AM > > > > To: Discussion of Residency Issues State Wide > > > > Subject: Re: Residency Training > > > > > > > > ***Janelle and I talked about the need for another session and I'm happy > > > > to see that many others could use a refresher course like us. > > > > > > > > But then I began wondering about the implications of the bill that will be > > > > submitted again this year to create a different residency law for > > > > community colleges. Would it be prudent to wait for the outcome of > > > > that? > > > > > > > > Joe St.Hilaire > > > > Western > > > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Carol Pitts wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes! Most definitely count me in. I am fumbling through this at best. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .