From jgibson000@mpdr0.chicago.il.ameritech.net Wed Apr 7 14:44:29 1999 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA36106 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 14:44:27 -0700 Received: from mailhost.chi.ameritech.net (mpdr0.chicago.il.ameritech.net [206.141.239.142]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id OAA22402 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 14:44:26 -0700 Received: from mailhost.chi.ameritech.net ([199.179.163.233]) by mailhost.chi.ameritech.net (InterMail v03.02.07 118 124) with ESMTP id <19990407214335.FJDX23382@mailhost.chi.ameritech.net> for ; Wed, 7 Apr 1999 16:43:35 -0500 Message-ID: <370BD0E1.18A226EA@mailhost.chi.ameritech.net> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 1999 16:40:49 -0500 From: "Jeffrey B. Gibson" Reply-To: jgibson000@ameritech.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: classics@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: hypothetical sources References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8CC29689CFF97E1A32E8BF03" --------------8CC29689CFF97E1A32E8BF03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Edwin P. Menes" wrote: > Another example comes from the Roman grammarians. Diomedes and Charisius > tend to cite the same texts as examples. Priscian cites those and more. > He's clearly not using D & C. All three must be using an earlier > grammarian. May I ask if this is your deduction -- or is it the "standard" way, when these facts are noted, that those who note them explain them? Yours, Jeffrey Gibson -- Jeffrey B. Gibson 7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A Chicago, Illinois 60626 e-mail jgibson000@ameritech.net --------------8CC29689CFF97E1A32E8BF03 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Edwin P. Menes" wrote:
Another example comes from the Roman grammarians.  Diomedes  and Charisius
tend to cite the same texts as examples.  Priscian cites those and more.
He's clearly not using D & C.  All  three must  be using an earlier
grammarian.
May I ask if this is your deduction -- or is it the "standard" way, when these facts are noted, that those who note them explain them?

Yours,

Jeffrey Gibson
--
Jeffrey B. Gibson
7423 N. Sheridan Road #2A
Chicago, Illinois 60626
e-mail jgibson000@ameritech.net
  --------------8CC29689CFF97E1A32E8BF03-- .