From dickson@wsu.edu Mon Apr 29 12:50:44 1996
Received: from mx3.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW96.04/UW-NDC Revision: 2.33 ) id AA22386;
	Mon, 29 Apr 96 12:50:44 -0700
Received: from cheetah.it.wsu.edu by mx3.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW96.04/UW-NDC Revision: 2.33 ) id AA29113;
	Mon, 29 Apr 96 12:50:43 -0700
Received: from FRAD342G.wsu.edu (frad342g.french.wsu.edu [134.121.31.37]) by cheetah.it.wsu.edu (8.6.13/WSUit-1.1) with SMTP id MAA12067 for <residency@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:50:43 -0700
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:50:43 -0700
Message-Id: <2.2.16.19960429124823.4127e0e4@mail.wsu.edu>
X-Sender: dickson@mail.wsu.edu
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (16)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: residency@u.washington.edu
From: Michael Dickson <dickson@wsu.edu>
Subject: Re: Americorps participants

Both Clair McNeal and Mike Dickson at WSU agree with you.

At 11:34 AM 4/29/96 -0700, you wrote:
>It would be my considered opinion that a person who comes to the state
>as an Americorps participant would be comparable to one who is tranferred
>here in the military and that it would be necessary for that person to
>take documentable steps to begin the 12-month domiciling period in order
>to be classified as a resident.
>
>I am being pestered by an applicant who came to the state last summer with 
>Americorps, but she didn't change her driver's license and vehicle 
>registration until this spring.  She claims she made her declaration of 
>intent to become a resident last summer and that the Americorps 
>assignment is like a regular job for which one moves permanently to the 
>state.
>
>Aggravating the situation is the fact that an Americorps friend of hers was 
>recently classified as a resident by another state college for next fall.
>
>Getting opinions out of our assistant attorney general is like pulling 
>teeth, so I thought I'd bounce this one off you.  
>
>Any comments?
>
>Joe St.Hilaire
>Western Washington University
>
>

.