From bazemore@massmed.org Sun Sep 30 08:12:09 2001 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with SMTP id f8UFC8N87442 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 08:12:08 -0700 Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Sun Sep 30 08:12:07 2001 -0700 Received: from pegasus.ultra.net (pegasus.ultra.net [146.115.8.53]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.11.6+UW01.08/8.11.6+UW01.08) with ESMTP id f8UFC7w08905 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 08:12:07 -0700 Received: from bazemore (207-172-97-243.s243.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.97.243]) by pegasus.ultra.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA16957 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 11:12:02 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001701c149c2$427dac60$f361accf@bazemore> From: "Bob Bazemore" To: References: <3BB73240.94A6B35D@caratzas.com> Subject: Re: On the Dispilio (mystery) tablets ... a PS Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 11:12:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 And may I recommend Calvert Watkins' Dictionary of Indo-European Roots, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 2000 with a fine introduction and explanation and his How to Kill a Dragon, Oxford U. Press, 1995. Bob Bazemore ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. S. Philobiblos" To: Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 10:55 AM Subject: Re: On the Dispilio (mystery) tablets ... a PS > Let us not start all over again. I seem to remember that a kind member of the > list already recommended Cambell's excellent and accessible book on historical > linguistics. > > C. Caratzas > > S S wrote: > > > "J. S. Philobiblos" wrote: > > >"I can imagine that such a > > >thesis would belong to the school of extreme Greek cultural chauvinism that > > >also > > >denies that proto Indo-european exists... > > > > Now, I hope that nobody decides to put words in my mouth or misconstrue my > > intention... but, I was under the impression that the proto Indo-European > > origin theory was just that... a *theory*, one that lacks any conclusive > > evidence for its establishment. Has there been any hard evidence produced > > for the existence of proto-Indo-European, aside from relatively recent > > conjectural linguistics? Have there been any discoveries of inscriptions > > etc., in the so-called proto Indo-European `language'? Exactly how and when > > did the proto Indo-European theory develop? > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Sotiris Sotiropoulos > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp > .