From wskinner@fast.net Fri Feb 16 06:51:49 2001 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW00.12) with ESMTP id GAA23558 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:51:48 -0800 Received: from mx2.fast.net (mx2.fast.net [198.69.204.97]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id GAA16813 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:51:48 -0800 Received: from imr2.fast.net (imr2.fast.net [198.69.204.71]) by mx2.fast.net (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1GEpif00925 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:51:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from fast.net (maxtnt02-165.abepa.fast.net [204.120.82.165]) by imr2.fast.net (Mirapoint) with ESMTP id AAW06375 (AUTH wskinner); Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:51:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3A8D3EB8.CE7B5A48@fast.net> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:52:41 -0500 From: Ric Skinner X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (Win98; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: waphgis@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: WAPHGIS: Internet accelerator References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks to Ron for the webRocket tip. I only have one question, is he participating in Ascentive's multi-level marketing program whereby he will get 50% of sales made to other WAPHGIS members? If so, that should have been noted in his "marketing" email to the list. Ric Health Maps wrote: > Thanks for the tip. Here is one for you: I just downloaded and installed > webROCKET from Ascentive. http://www.ascentive.com They claim to double your > effective internet > speed by optimizing internal buffers and allowing for simultaneous two-way > transfers (near as I can tell). This improvement is supposed to work for > ALL types of connections, from modems to broadband. > > Well, it works for me. It has almost doubled my throughput. In a straight > "speed test", my dual-channel ISDN went from averaging 86kB/s to 113kB/s. > Apparant speed has easily doubled since that involves all of the handshaking > needed for loading web pages and reacting to user inputs. > > Cost: about $35. Well worth it so far and no side effects. > > Ron .