From jjhuff@cs.washington.edu Wed Jul  4 12:44:52 2001
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f64Jip049420
	for <linux@lists.u.washington.edu>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:44:51 -0700
Received: from fiji.cs.washington.edu (fiji.cs.washington.edu [128.95.8.16])
	by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f64Jips01133
	for <linux@u.washington.edu>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:44:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (jjhuff@localhost)
	by fiji.cs.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/0.4) with ESMTP id MAA22098
	for <linux@u.washington.edu>; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:44:50 -0700
	(envelope-from jjhuff@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Justin Huff <jjhuff@cs.washington.edu>
To: UW Linux Group <linux@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Pine and Pico Article
In-Reply-To: <20010704120256.B17431@washington.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0107041243560.22086-100000@fiji.cs.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

I wasn't faulting debian at all.  They can do whatever pleases them.
--Justin
> It might seem like a small issue, but debian isn't going to change its rules
> to accomodate the UW.  That's great if slackware distributes a modified
> pine binary (for which they must have a special license from the UW), but if
> somebody else wants to make a "super-slackware" and redistributes slackware
> pine, they can be sued. 

.