From frit0028@gold.tc.umn.edu Sat Oct 11 00:53:32 1997
Received: from mx5.u.washington.edu (mx5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.6])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id AAA38384 for <failure@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 00:53:31 -0700
Received: from mhub2.tc.umn.edu (0@mhub2.tc.umn.edu [128.101.131.52])
          by mx5.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with SMTP
	  id AAA18728 for <failure@u.washington.edu>; Sat, 11 Oct 1997 00:53:29 -0700
Received: from gold.tc.umn.edu by mhub2.tc.umn.edu; Sat, 11 Oct 97 02:53:27 -0500
Received: from pub-29-a-196.dialup.umn.edu by gold.tc.umn.edu; Sat, 11 Oct 97 02:53:25 -0500
From: "matthew fritscher" <frit0028@gold.tc.umn.edu>
To: failure@u.washington.edu
Subject: So here I sit thinking...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: POPmail 2.3b7
Message-Id: <343f30776c67003@mhub2.tc.umn.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 97 02:53:28 -0500

...I haven't written to this list in a while and well...I should write in and 
see if anyone is still reading this by this point.  So I have been mourning the 
Failure breakup on and off:  its seems like the breakup is on more than it is 
off.  About 70-30 says its on perhaps.  "Seven out of ten!" people think the 
breakup is "on" for those non-math majors out there...no disregard that...the 
information is not official. The information submitted is one person's opinion 
and therefore should be dismissed in the numerical form. 

Matt (in one of the twin cities, the one that starts with M.) 


.