From Quinn@webmail.hope.edu Sun Jan 21 12:01:53 2001 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW00.12) with ESMTP id MAA122108 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:01:52 -0800 Received: from hope.edu (webmail.hope.edu [198.110.98.17]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id MAA01639 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 12:01:52 -0800 Received: from [198.110.99.158] (Quinn@webmail.hope.edu); Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:01:07 -0500 X-WM-Posted-At: hope.edu; Sun, 21 Jan 01 15:01:07 -0500 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <000201c083df$565c2940$4de81ec4@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:01:55 -0500 To: classics@u.washington.edu From: John Quinn Subject: Re: Scotus, no dunce Slight clarification of the following: >I do wonder why exactly John Duns, or whoever first >used the epithet of him, found it useful or necessary. (Of course, he was >not the first Johannes from Scotland to be called Scotus, being preceded in >this by Johannes Scotus Eriugena, or John the Scot, in the 9th century.) Eriugena was from Ireland. "Scotus" refers to Gaelic-speaking people; with the rise of the Scottish nation in the later Middle Ages the Latin adjective comes increasingly to refer to that kingdom alone (and despite teh rich linguistic diversity found therein). jtq .