From halftrak@u.washington.edu Mon Nov 25 11:57:59 1996 Received: from jason03.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu (5.65+UW96.08/UW-NDC Revision: 2.33 ) id AA13206; Mon, 25 Nov 96 11:57:59 -0800 Received: from homer15.u.washington.edu (homer15.u.washington.edu [140.142.70.16]) by jason03.u.washington.edu (8.8.2+UW96.11/8.8.2+UW96.10) with ESMTP id LAA14606 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 11:56:48 -0800 Received: from localhost (halftrak@localhost) by homer15.u.washington.edu (8.8.2+UW96.11/8.8.2+UW96.11) with SMTP id LAA75660 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 1996 11:57:58 -0800 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 1996 11:57:57 -0800 (PST) From: "R. Merz" To: kaorder@u.washington.edu Subject: Matt Sisk Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Gentlemen- I move we close debate on Matt Sisk. He has made his decision. Some of us agree, some of us don't, and I'm sure some don't care. Let's just agree to to disagree and if a similar situation arises in the future we'll deal with it then, and hopefully use what we've learned this time. Everyone feels differently about this situation, some knew Matt well, and some not at all, and some are on every level in between. Let's just move on, okay? Matt has said his piece, some of us have responded to him directly, and I think everyone is aware of everybody else's opinions on the matter. Jamison has met with him in person, and I'm sure Suneet has spoken with him as well. It's not worth arguing about. Suneet is not going to change Dan's mind, and vice versa. Let's concentrate on things we can change. Thanks, MERZERKER P.S. Regardless what you may think, Suneet, your opinion matters equally whether you hold a "formal" position or not, as well as whether you are an "original" member or not. In discussions of this nature, we are all equals, and all have the right to have our opinions heard. Now I shall step down off my soapbox. .