From ggaskell@paradise.net.nz Sun Mar 25 00:49:19 2001 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW00.12) with ESMTP id AAA09662 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 00:48:55 -0800 From: ggaskell@paradise.net.nz Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.03) with ESMTP id f2P8mr712642 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 00:48:54 -0800 Received: from 203-96-158-124.tnt4.paradise.net.nz (bridget.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.27]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f2P8mqX89265 for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:48:52 +1200 (NZST) Message-Id: <200103250848.f2P8mqX89265@deborah.paradise.net.nz> To: classics@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Justinian et al. / Lucian's _Dialogues of the Courtesans_ Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 08:48:52 GMT X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.0.26 > Well - let me stress this - I did NOT bring this discussion DOWN this path. > This resulted from questions I asked, and replies I got to those INITIAL > questions. Only AFTER that - when in those responses did others bring up > NON-classical points, did I respond. OK, I accept that you were simply obeying orders. > Now, even if this were not the case, however, I do not think it is healthy > for the "classics" to isolate themselves from "other" things; nor other > things to isolate themselves from the classics. So I actually WELCOME these > "connections" -- and indeed -- REASON for many of my questions goes WELL > beyond "classics" in themselves, and relates to "classics" as they relate to > today. Very much the usual argument; had this been a game of chess, I might have called it "The Nuremburg Gambit" - indeed everyone seems to fall for it, so it is probably strategically sound. Yours irrelevantly and somewhat irreverently Geoffrey Gaskell .