From jminer@whatcom.ctc.edu Wed Jun 9 16:10:15 2004 Received: from mxe5.u.washington.edu (mxe5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.168]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.05) with ESMTP id i59NAEOX018122 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:10:15 -0700 Received: from blakely.whatcom.ctc.edu (blakely.ctc.edu [134.39.214.24]) by mxe5.u.washington.edu (8.12.11+UW04.02/8.12.11+UW04.03) with ESMTP id i59NAAOx024247 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:10:10 -0700 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Subject: RE: presumption/no presumption Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:08:02 -0700 Message-ID: <915B71727D8C3744B30A952CC40B7D038030E6@BLAKELY.wcc.whatcom.ctc.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Janelle Miner" To: X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='SUPERLONG_LINE 0.003, __EVITE_CTYPE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __HAS_MIMEOLE 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __UNUSABLE_MSGID 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0' I think you have clear evidence that even though the student immediately = enrolled in 6 or more credits, his primary purpose for coming to WA was = his wife's employment. Even though he didn't comply with WDL, MVR or = VR, he did purchase a home--and that process starts the 1-year clock = ticking. Had he only shown a rental/lease agreement, it would be a = different story. Janelle Miner, Registrar Whatcom Community College 237 W. Kellogg Road Bellingham, WA 98226 (360) 676-2170, ext. 3218 jminer@whatcom.ctc.edu -----Original Message----- From: RESIDENCY-owner@u.washington.edu = [mailto:RESIDENCY-owner@u.washington.edu] On Behalf Of Lane Anderson Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 12:10 PM To: Discussion of Residency Issues State Wide Subject: presumption/no presumption Hi all Looking for some thoughts on this one: I have an individual who's wife became employed with our university starting Fall 03. Used the spouse waiver Fall 03-Spring 04 for res tuition Put earnest money down on house in June 03 Closed in July 03 Returned in Aug 03 with personal belongings Enrolled Fall 03 for 6 credits Enrolled Winter 04 10 credits Enrolled Spring 05 9 credits Did wdl and voter reg in dec 03 Vehicle reg in oct 03 What's your thoughts on presumption, no presumption and thoughts on which way to go? I have an idea what I should do, just wanna see if some of you out there are thinking the same way I am. Thanks .