From cwilli@seaccd.sccd.ctc.edu Fri Dec  5 16:16:07 1997
Received: from mx5.u.washington.edu (mx5.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.6])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id QAA30394 for <residency@lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 16:16:05 -0800
Received: from seaccd.sccd.ctc.edu (seaccd.sccd.ctc.edu [134.39.60.61])
          by mx5.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
	  id QAA15741 for <residency@u.washington.edu>; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 16:16:02 -0800
Received: by seaccd.sccd.ctc.edu
	(1.40.112.8/16.2) id AA064487641; Fri, 5 Dec 1997 16:20:41 -0800
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 16:20:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Carlos Williams <cwilli@seaccd.sccd.ctc.edu>
To: Discussion of Residency Issues State Wide <residency@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: Full-time Employment
In-Reply-To: <205934FB3A2DD011BD1B08002BE60170F30AD8@email1.bcc.ctc.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.HPP.3.96.971205160105.5526A-100000@seaccd.sccd.ctc.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Tika,

I would consider this dependent student eligible for the in-state
residency tuition for Fall quarter. The only time I would scrutinize the
dates on a driver's license, voter's card, or vehicle registration is when
statutory presumption is involved.  In this case, the parent's would have
had to enroll in more that 6 hours sometime during the 12 month period.

Carlos Williams
Admissions Director
Seattle Central CC

On Fri, 5 Dec 1997, Tika Esler  wrote:

> "The establishment of a domicile is not determined on the basis of a
> single factor; nor is a predetermined number of factors required."
> 
> I have often looked at this statement in the law and figured that I want
> at least "two" factors to help me determine residency, and I suppose
> under extreme circumstances might there truly be only ONE factor to
> consider.
> 
> I have a dependent student.  Father sent us documentation that he was
> employed full-time in July 1996.  Lived in a motel for 4 1/2 months,
> didn't register his vehicle because he provided documentation that the
> company leased him a vehicle until March 1997, mother provides her
> driver's license issued in January 1997, and she registered to vote in
> November 1996.  All other documentation is not usable.
> 
> He has been granted residency for Winter 1998.  Mother is meeting with
> me to appeal this decision based on her husband's full-time employment,
> and they want residency for Fall.  Employment would be the only "factor"
> that is a full year prior to fall commencing.   Is he a resident for
> Fall or Winter???
> 

.