From jeffchiu@u.washington.edu Thu Oct 24 20:38:31 2002 Received: from mailscan1.cac.washington.edu (mailscan1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.16]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with SMTP id g9P3cUFD096140 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:38:30 -0700 Received: FROM mxu3.u.washington.edu BY mailscan1.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Oct 24 20:38:30 2002 -0700 Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.5]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with ESMTP id g9P3cUMH021240 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:38:30 -0700 Received: from mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.17]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with SMTP id g9P3cUPl002628 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:38:30 -0700 Received: FROM smtp.washington.edu BY mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu ; Thu Oct 24 20:38:29 2002 -0700 Received: from jambalaya (rdslppp81.sttl.uswest.net [63.224.35.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with ESMTP id g9P3cSqk021860 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:38:29 -0700 Message-ID: <005a01c27bd7$fbb1e500$0201a8c0@jambalaya> From: "Jeffrey Chiu" To: References: Subject: Re: proposal draft Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:38:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4920.2300 My free slots next week: Tuesday: 2:30-5:00 Wednesday 2:30-whenever Thursday 2:30-whenever Jeff ----- Original Message ----- From: "todd f tietchen" To: "Transnational Studies Group" Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 3:55 PM Subject: Re: proposal draft > > Hello all...Thanks again Jeff for taking the time to draft this document. > While I think it would be a good idea to begin discussing it over the > listserv, I think we also need to get together as a group and do some > re-writing and editing. What days/times are best for everyone? I would > prefer to meet on a Tuesday or Thursday and my time is wide open on those > days. Friday is great for me as well. Should we meet next week? > > I think it's important that we meet, as there are also a few other issues we > need to discuss. Perhaps we can take a half hour before we begin editing > to handle other project business. I would like to update everyone on the > budget and arrangements for Lisa Lowe. I also think it's important to > settle issues of organization for next year's project. In other words, there > needs to be some discussion about who the chief organizer, or chair, or > co-chairs, is/are going to be, as the Simpson Center will want to know this. > Is there anything else we need to add to the agenda? Should I assemble an > agenda, Kellie, or would you like to continue doing it? T. > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ ___ > Todd F. Tietchen > Department of English > University of Washington > Seattle, WA 98195-4330 > > > On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, J. Chiu wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > Here is a draft I did today of the proposal due in November. It's rough, > > probably has typos and lots of awkward phrasings, but I'm satisfied it > > captures the thrust of some of our collective conversations (especially > > Lesley's and Todd's contributions) about what we'd like to see next year. > > > > I'd appreciate feedback on the listserv. Please forward to anyone who > > would like to start getting involved with the group (particularly those > > outside of English!). > > > > Jeff > > > > .