From akriman@darwin.helios.nd.edu Sun Apr 1 11:36:16 2001 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.03) with ESMTP id f31IaF209024 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 11:36:15 -0700 Received: from mailspool.helios.nd.edu (mailspool.helios.nd.edu [129.74.250.7]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.03) with ESMTP id f31IaFM24047 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 11:36:15 -0700 Received: from darwin.helios.nd.edu (darwin.helios.nd.edu [129.74.250.114]) by mailspool.helios.nd.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA26309 for ; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:36:14 -0500 (EST) Received: (from akriman@localhost) by darwin.helios.nd.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/ND-cluster) id f31IaDH05799 for classics@u.washington.edu; Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:36:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:36:13 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred M Kriman Message-Id: <200104011836.f31IaDH05799@darwin.helios.nd.edu> To: classics@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Deus mei Erus (was: RE: Redneck Latin) Rainer Thiel writes, i.a., > ... But it is certainly a most uncommon, and from the perspective > of even late antique Latin un-idiomatic way to re-phrase the common > Biblical "Deus dominus meus." , which neatly raises the question: why do it? Is it too far-fetched to suppose that the defective expression "Deus mei Erus" was chosen because its American pronunciation suggests ~Jesus may hear us~? AMK .