From GthomGt@cs.com Mon Nov 1 13:57:19 1999 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id NAA43350 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:57:16 -0800 From: GthomGt@cs.com Received: from csimo02.mx.cs.com (csimo02.mx.cs.com [205.188.156.53]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id NAA05405 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:57:15 -0800 Received: from GthomGt@cs.com by csimo02.mx.cs.com (mail_out_v23.6.) id dPUUa02521 (4403) for ; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 16:57:05 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0.155fff95.254f66b1@cs.com> Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 16:57:05 EST Subject: Re: A "Balanced" View To: classics@u.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: CompuServe 2000 32-bit sub 65 In a message dated 11/1/99 3:17:36 PM Eastern Standard Time, brucet@csufresno.edu writes: > Don't you think that > the uniquely Western intellectual dynamism-- the freedom to rely on > individual initiative, to adapt quickly to rapidly changing circumstances, > to improvise new solutions and tactics unforeseen in rigid, deterministic > cosmologies, etc etc-- had a tad bit to do with it? I don't know about the rest of you, but in my balanced view Bruce Thornton is very funny. GT .