From meuser@mapcruzin.com Thu Jun 21 14:17:08 2001 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f5LLH3038274 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:17:04 -0700 Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f5LLH2F13291 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:17:02 -0700 Received: from ekim (user-2ivfl1d.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.212.45]) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA24811 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:17:01 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael Meuser" To: waphgis@u.washington.edu Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:16:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: e-maps still a slug? Message-ID: <3B3201D4.27331.3B19D2@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) HI - I just checked the HUD e-maps again, hoping that they finally actually worked as advertised. http://hudemaps2.esri.com/SearchFrame.asp To me they still seem basically useless -- too slow, no detail when it is needed -- basically a flop. I'm still quite amazed at this since this should be the flagship application for ESRI's mapserver technology. It was developed by ESRI techs, runs on ESRI servers. It should be dynamite, but it's a dud. Anyone had better luck that I? Anyone found an ESRI mapserver that actually works well enough that visitors won't just give up and go away? thnx Mike .