From simsa@televar.com Tue Feb 24 13:19:55 1998 Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP id NAA30304 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:19:53 -0800 Received: from concord.televar.com (root@concord.televar.com [208.8.131.83]) by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP id NAA21820 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:19:46 -0800 Received: from LOCALNAME (wenuser020.televar.com [208.26.163.34]) by concord.televar.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA21761 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:19:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <34F33984.38AE@televar.com> Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:20:04 -0800 From: "Robert A. (Tony) Sims" Reply-To: simsa@televar.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (Win16; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ph-assess@u.washington.edu Subject: Re: Win 95 and Vista References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Solet, David wrote: > > Greg et al, just for clarification, the bottom line of Jim's message is > only that people should be on Windows 95 to take advantage of 32-bit > (i.e., much faster, multi-tasking) software, and that Vista will > eventually be re-written to run--faster--for that operating system. I > believe the upgrade from Windows 3.1 to Windows 95 is pretty > inexpensive, and brings with it a lot of other benefits--for one thing, > much better memory management and many fewer computer crashes. > > >---------- > >The software requires minimum hardware for each of our systems. Win 95 is hungary for RAM and Storage. RAM, storage and faster machines do not grow on trees in our district. -- Robert A. (Tony) Sims Administrator Chelan-Douglas Health District mailto:simsa@televar.com mailto:TONY@health-chelan-douglas.wa.gov http://www.televar.com/~storyg/cdhd.htm (509)664-5306 .