From maritl@u.washington.edu Tue Feb 24 13:37:23 1998
Received: from jason03.u.washington.edu (root@jason03.u.washington.edu [140.142.77.10])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id NAA27328 for <fegrad@lists.u.washington.edu>; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:37:22 -0800
Received: from dante14.u.washington.edu (maritl@dante14.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.40])
          by jason03.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id NAA35670 for <fegrad@u.washington.edu>; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:37:22 -0800
Received: from localhost (maritl@localhost)
          by dante14.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.04) with SMTP
	  id NAA64402 for <fegrad@u.washington.edu>; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:37:21 -0800
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:37:20 -0800 (PST)
From: "M. Larson" <maritl@u.washington.edu>
To: Forest Engr Graduate Students <fegrad@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: fe529 process group Reality check (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.96.980218153606.6559A-100000@saul1.u.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.96a.980224133701.51052A-100000@dante14.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

The Hydrology Group discussed project objectives and geomorphic
and hydrologic characteristics and functions that would be required to
meet these objectives. To verify the validity of our recommendations and
feasibility of meeting the physical requirements, we identified the
following data needs.
 
1) HYDROLOGY
  i) downstream gauging records. (**Available)
  ii) well logs (Status not known - check with King County)
  iii) storm water runoff (Check with King County, e.g.
       calculations for existing culvert design)
  iv) locations of springs (Possibly requires field inspection or aerial
      photo analysis)
  v) channel modification (Possibly from historical air photos or King
     County or town records)
2) SEDIMENTS AND SOILS:
  i) soil survey (**Available)
  ii) field verification of soil survey at critical locations using soils
      cores, e.g. (Requires field work)
  iii) identification of sediment sources and erosion process (Requires
       field work)
3) TOPOGRAPHY
  i) survey data to determine existing channel slope and topography of
     potential relocation site (Unknown, probably requires field work)
  ii) survey to determine grade control locations, e.g. culvert elevation
     (Should be available from King County)
  ii) channel geometry dimensions - Newaukum and Spring (Probably requires
      field work)
4) HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOS (Probably available but quantity and quality
unknown)
  i) stream plan form and position
  ii) vegetation type and distribution


.