From jnachtig@u.washington.edu Tue Apr 16 07:22:41 1996
Return-Path: <jnachtig@u.washington.edu>
Received: from homer05.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW96.03/UW-NDC Revision: 2.33 ) id AA19120;
	Tue, 16 Apr 96 07:22:39 -0700
Received: from localhost by homer05.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW96.04/UW-NDC Revision: 2.33 ) id AA237936;
	Tue, 16 Apr 96 07:22:38 -0700
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 1996 07:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: "J. Nachtigal" <jnachtig@u.washington.edu>
To: Jan Heine <heine@u.washington.edu>
Cc: uwracing@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: B team
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.92a.960415140119.101920G-100000@homer24.u.washington.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.92a.960416072141.117600A-100000@homer05.u.washington.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

I am all for splitting up the B's if there are enough people to do this
for the Oregon race.  Jeff

On Mon, 15 Apr 1996, Jan Heine wrote:

> So, once more, the B team thing is coming up.  Seems like we'll have
> considerable spillover from the A's once more.  The big question is
> whether it is worth it to go to Oregon to race against a bunch of people
> who have little hope of beating us...  We could, and I am serious about
> this, split up our B team into two B teams and race each other.  This
> could be a lot of fun, and we'd learn more than by just rolling off the
> front.  I am tempted to stay in Seattle, and do some good, structured
> training otherwise....  Looking forward to your input.
>
> Jan
>
>

.