From jillwatk@web.net Tue Jul 21 17:53:25 1998
Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id RAA25894 for <indknow@lists.u.washington.edu>; Tue, 21 Jul 1998 17:53:24 -0700
From: jillwatk@web.net
Received: from web.net (root@web.net [192.139.37.21])
          by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
	  id RAA25588 for <indknow@u.washington.edu>; Tue, 21 Jul 1998 17:53:23 -0700
Received: from ts37-11.ott.istar.ca by web.net
	via rsmtp with smtp
	id <m0yynDJ-000Dr5C@web.net>
	for <indknow@u.washington.edu>; Tue, 21 Jul 1998 20:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
	(Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #1 built 1996-Oct-8)
Message-Id: <m0yynDJ-000Dr5C@web.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 20:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-BlackMail: ts37-11.ott.istar.ca, ts37-11.ott.istar.ca, jillwatk@web.net, 198.53.5.106
X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 20:57:01(EDT) on July 21, 1998
X-Sender: jillwatk@pop.web.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: indknow@u.washington.edu
Subject: Scientific knowledge and traditional knowledge 

Hello,

I am doing some work with the Canadian Wildlife Service (part of Environment
Canada) on endangered species, and I am trying to find some solid success
stories of wildlife / habitat management based on both scientific knowledge
and traditional knowledge.

I anticipate having to discuss with quite a number of people (having a
variety of attitudes) the validity of using both types of knowledge in
wildlife management, so wish to have some strong examples to show.  Ideally
Canadian examples would be best (since I may encounter jurisdictional
arguments) but examples from elsewhere would also be very welcome.

Thank you for all your help.  I would be happy to answer any questions you
may have about this work.


Jill

.