From vwheeler@bcc.ctc.edu Thu Aug 27 13:59:28 1998 Received: from mxu1.u.washington.edu (mxu1.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.8]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP id NAA63642 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 13:59:27 -0700 Received: from email1.bcc.ctc.edu (email1.bcc.ctc.edu [168.156.32.102]) by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP id NAA13890 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 13:59:26 -0700 Received: by email1.bcc.ctc.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 13:59:26 -0700 Message-ID: <205934FB3A2DD011BD1B08002BE6017001CA2DEF@email1.bcc.ctc.edu> From: Vicki Wheeler To: "'residency@u.washington.edu'" Subject: RE: One-Year Count Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 13:59:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Janelle, we've adhered very strictly to the "start of the quarter" policy mainly because where would the line be drawn? If we allow a 3-day leeway, as an example, and a student qualifies makes the 4th day, the argument becomes what difference can one day make? However, if others are allowing for flexibility, I would love to know. I agree with you that it seems punitive to make a student wait another quarter. Vicki Wheeler Bellevue Community College vwheeler@bcc.ctc.edu > ---------- > From: jmine@ctc.ctc.edu[SMTP:jmine@ctc.ctc.edu] > Reply To: residency@u.washington.edu > Sent: Thursday, August 27, 1998 12:45 PM > To: Discussion of Residency Issues State Wide > Subject: One-Year Count > > I seem to be getting a lot of requests for fall quarter residency where > the one-year count puts residency within a week or two of the start of > the quarter (example: quarter starts 9/23, WDL changed 10/2). > > Do we have any leeway with the one-year calculation? It seems a shame > for a student to have to wait another three months on a "technicality." > -- > Janelle Miner, Registrar > Whatcom Community College > jmine@ctc.ctc.edu or (360)676-2170 > .