From tganders@tscnet.com Mon Aug 28 14:58:51 2000 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.05/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA20020 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:58:48 -0700 Received: from mail.tscnet.net (IDENT:root@mail.tscnet.net [208.49.8.7]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW00.02/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA02697 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:58:47 -0700 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.tscnet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA14016; Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:56:15 -0700 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:56:15 -0700 Message-Id: <200008282156.OAA14016@mail.tscnet.net> From: tganders@tscnet.com To: waphgis@u.washington.edu Reply-To: tganders@tscnet.com References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Sinclair/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.10 Sender: tganders@sinclair.net X-Originating-IP: 198.97.167.160 Subject: Re: waphgis: Dealing with bookmarks ________________________________________________________ _regarding bookmarks - I can't second Majorie's nomination strongly enough. The principal reason that I use Netscape is the freedom it permits in using bookmark organizers and storage devices. In some cases, I can't even communicate with colleagues who are still using IE. Haven't yet found anything that I need to do that can't be done with Netscape. Would be interested in hearing from anyone that feels differently. Tom ========================================= This mail sent through Sinclair's WebMail http://mail.sinclair.net .