From nweise@u.washington.edu Fri Oct  4 12:39:33 2002
Received: from mailscan2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.16])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with SMTP id g94Jd7FD095362
	for <uwracing@reallists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:39:08 -0700
Received: FROM mxu1.u.washington.edu BY mailscan2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Oct 04 12:39:06 2002 -0700
Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu (mxout3.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.19])
	by mxu1.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with ESMTP id g94Jd6dY015515
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
	for <uwracing@lists.u.washington.edu>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:39:06 -0700
Received: from mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.17])
	by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.09) with SMTP id g94Jd67J007438
	for <uwracing@u.washington.edu>; Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:39:06 -0700
Received: FROM hymn07.u.washington.edu BY mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu ; Fri Oct 04 12:39:04 2002 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hymn07.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.08) with ESMTP id g94Jd4YR009812;
	Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:39:04 -0700
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 12:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Nicholas A. Weise" <nweise@u.washington.edu>
To: aschmid@u.washington.edu
cc: Anton Jackson <nexo@u.washington.edu>, <uwracing@u.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: the big question
In-Reply-To: <pine.lnx.4.43.0210041051060.28008@hymn10.u.washington.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0210041239040.9395@hymn07.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII

hey, i cant blame them, wishfull thinking isnt a crime...

Nick


On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 aschmid@u.washington.edu wrote:

> Ok, I'm getting a bit too much information about Tye and Anton's fantasy life.  Satin sheets?!  Ten women plucking out your leg hair?!  You guys are crazy!
> Amy
> 
> 
> On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Anton Jackson wrote:
> 
> > nothing beats that feeling of sliding into those jeans or lined wool slacks
> > with freshly shorn legs.  or my satin sheets, for that matter.
> > 
> > > From: Ania Mitros <ania@cs.washington.edu>
> > > Reply-To: ania@cs.washington.edu
> > > Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 10:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
> > > To: uwracing@u.washington.edu
> > > Subject: Re: the big question
> > > 
> > > You can also ride a bicycle with hairy legs.  I've seen it done.
> > > Somehow, the bike moves forward anyway.
> > > 
> > > The arguments I can think of for shaving are:
> > > * If you crash, the road burn isn't as bad.  Hair likes to grip the
> > > asphalt, so as you're sliding you rip off more skin if you're fuzzy.
> > > * After you crash, it's less painful to change bandages if you've
> > > shaved.
> > > * It's fashionable.  All the guys do it.  Plus shaved muscular legs
> > > ARE cuter than fuzzy ones.
> > > * Air resistance.  Swimmers will shave their entire bodes before
> > > races, too.  Talk to someone who does fluid mechanics about whether
> > > it really makes a difference.
> > > * Weight.  If you just spent $200 to shave half an ounce off your bike,
> > > you might as well shave half an ounce off yourself.
> > > * The economy isn't doing so well.  We should support BIC.
> > > 
> > > Do you guys have any others?
> > > 
> > > Ania
> > > 
> > > P.S.  If you do shave, consider using a woman's razor.  The main
> > > difference (other than the pastel color) is the angle of the blade.  Men's
> > > razors are meant to be held almost perpendicularily to the face, whereas
> > > women's razors are meant to be held almost parallel to the leg.  So for
> > > shaving legs, women's razors are more convenient.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 


.