From kristin.manke@pnl.gov Mon Nov  1 14:15:11 1999
Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7])
	by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.09) with ESMTP id OAA41968
	for <index-nw@lists.u.washington.edu>; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 14:15:10 -0800
Received: from relay.pnl.gov (relay.pnl.gov [130.20.64.29])
	by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.09/8.9.3+UW99.08) with ESMTP id OAA08232
	for <INDEX-NW@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 14:15:09 -0800
Received: from pnlmse1.pnl.gov ([130.20.128.21])
 by pnl.gov (PMDF V5.2-32 #35482) with ESMTP id <01JHTQZ55BA28Y5B2N@pnl.gov>
 for INDEX-NW@u.washington.edu; Mon, 1 Nov 1999 14:15:05 PST
Received: by PNLMSE1.pnl.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
	id <WBXJRFAC>; Mon, 01 Nov 1999 14:15:04 -0800
Content-return: allowed
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 1999 14:15:02 -0800
From: "Manke, Kristin L" <kristin.manke@pnl.gov>
Subject: What do you think? Entry logic
To: "'INDEX-NW@u.washington.edu'" <INDEX-NW@u.washington.edu>
Message-id: <C4A7F6EF6AFAD211998D0008C7A4571F28EEFE@pnlmse7.pnl.gov>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-type: text/plain

Hi there,

I'm working on a book on the accident at the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant. One
chapter discusses the accident in detail and the others deal with exposure
levels to workers, the public, societal impacts, environmental impacts, etc. I
would like to tell the reader that if they want to understand how the accident
happened, root causes, etc., they should go to Chapter 2 (pages 5-34).

My questions are: 1) would an entry under accident, Chronobyl NPP be toooooo
broad? If so, what would be better?  2) Is the page range toooo long to be
useful?

Thanks in advance,
Kristin Manke
Pacific NW National Laboratory
.