From saint@admsec.wwu.edu Mon Mar  3 17:22:38 1997
Received: from mx4.u.washington.edu by lists.u.washington.edu
	(5.65+UW96.08/UW-NDC Revision: 2.33 ) id AA21538;
	Mon, 3 Mar 97 17:22:38 -0800
Received: from admsec.wwu.edu (gaea.admsec.wwu.edu [140.160.249.20])
          by mx4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW96.12/8.8.4+UW96.12) with ESMTP
	  id RAA12335 for <residency@u.washington.edu>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:22:35 -0800
Received: by gaea.admsec.wwu.edu id <17298>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:21:45 -0800
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 17:23:31 -0800
From: "Joseph M. St.Hilaire" <saint@admsec.wwu.edu>
To: residency@u.washington.edu
Subject: Itinerant student
Message-Id: <97Mar3.172145pst.17298@gaea.admsec.wwu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Okay, here's a good one:

She moved to Washington in December 95, lived with her sister in Everett,
got a Wash driver's license and veh reg.  In February 96 she moved back 
to Hawaii due to a job offer, and she stayed there until returning
briefly to Everett in August.  Then she moved to Oregon in September to 
attend school there, and she's there still.  However, since her veh reg
expired, she registered the car in Oregon (!).  She thinks I should
classify her as a resident.

My answer:  I can't do that because she never spent her 12 months in
residence.  Furthermore, she negated her attempt to become a Washington 
resident by returning to Hawaii, by moving immediately down to Oregon, 
and by registering her car in Oregon.  If she had spent a full year in 
Washington before going back to Hawaii for a *temporary* job, and if she 
hadn't changed her veh reg, perhaps I could justify it.

What do you think?

Joe St.Hilaire
Western
.