From guenther@tigger.it.wsu.edu Thu Sep  3 13:15:48 1998
Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
	  id NAA16516 for <k20cache@lists.u.washington.edu>; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:15:48 -0700
Received: from cheetah.it.wsu.edu (root@cheetah.it.wsu.edu [134.121.1.8])
          by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW98.06) with ESMTP
	  id NAA05524 for <K20CACHE@u.washington.edu>; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:15:47 -0700
Received: from tigger (tigger.it.wsu.edu [134.121.11.6])
	by cheetah.it.wsu.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA05644
	for <K20CACHE@u.washington.edu>; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:15:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by tigger (5.65v4.0/1.1.19.2/04Mar98-0829AM)
	id AA26234; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:15:45 -0700
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:15:45 -0700
From: Dean Guenther <guenther@tigger.it.wsu.edu>
Message-Id: <199809032015.AA26234@tigger>
To: K20CACHE@u.washington.edu
Subject: webcache comparisons
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Md5: Af9SPP9WNzHR72ZwT4lcDw==

Is there a url to a page somewhere that compares webcache engines? We are using squid at the moment. But we also have 
a machine running apache and its caching is also turned on. I'd be interested in 
seeing any kind of comparisons between caching software. -- Dean




Dean Guenther                   Internet: guenther@wsu.edu
Washington State University     AT&T:     509 335-0433
Pullman, WA. 99164-1222         fax:      509 335-0540
www & UNIX System Admin

.