From foobar@u.washington.edu Sun Aug 1 04:28:45 1999 Received: from jason05.u.washington.edu (root@jason05.u.washington.edu [140.142.78.6]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id EAA66748 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 04:28:44 -0700 Received: from dante11.u.washington.edu (foobar@dante11.u.washington.edu [140.142.15.37]) by jason05.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id EAA11610 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 04:28:43 -0700 Received: from localhost (foobar@localhost) by dante11.u.washington.edu (8.9.3+UW99.02/8.9.3+UW99.01) with ESMTP id EAA52670 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 04:28:43 -0700 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 04:28:43 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael S. Hornung" To: linux@u.washington.edu Subject: output from 'time' Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I'm using the 'time' command to try and compare some scripts I wrote. The first appears to actually finish faster (in less elapsed time). The man page is useless. Can someone describe what the return values are trying to tell me? [grogan][/home/phix/tmp/perlipc]% time ./t hosts ....[output here]... 0.170u 0.060s 0:04.50 5.1% 0+0k 0+0io 687pf+0w [grogan][/home/phix/tmp/perlipc]% time ./x hosts ....[output here]... 0.150u 0.010s 0:12.53 1.2% 0+0k 0+0io 667pf+0w ----------------------------------------------- Michael Hornung foobar@u.washington.edu .