From dmeadows@idirect.com Sun Jul 1 03:34:09 2001 Received: from mxu2.u.washington.edu (mxu2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.9]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f61AXw076514 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 03:33:58 -0700 Received: from deimos.idirect.com (deimos.idirect.com [207.136.80.182]) by mxu2.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f61AXwK18607 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 03:33:58 -0700 Received: from hk9k801.idirect.com (on-ham-a53-04-158.look.ca [216.154.53.222]) by deimos.idirect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA93485 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:33:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010701063032.00a4c200@idirect.com> X-Sender: dmeadows@idirect.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 06:36:16 -0400 To: classics@u.washington.edu From: David Meadows Subject: Re: pedica satur (:- o) In-Reply-To: <000801c10199$3b930740$50eb1ec4@al40> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Perhaps I'm being dense in this particular thread, but wouldn't the final line be an (obvious) reference to oral sex with "completion"??? i.e. the reference to the 'remaining eye' is a reference to a mouth; I can't think of a parallel, of course, although what immediately sprung to mind was at the other end: Chaucer's 'nether eye' ... dm .