From ptrourke@mediaone.net Sun Jun 24 05:45:59 2001 Received: from mxu3.u.washington.edu (mxu3.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.7]) by lists.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f5OCjw072922 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 05:45:58 -0700 Received: from chmls20.mediaone.net (chmls20.mediaone.net [24.147.1.156]) by mxu3.u.washington.edu (8.11.2+UW01.01/8.11.2+UW01.04) with ESMTP id f5OCjvX18489 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 05:45:57 -0700 Received: from [24.147.87.1] (h0030651acb43.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.87.1]) by chmls20.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5OCju620989 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:45:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 08:45:57 -0400 Subject: T.I.D. From: Patrick Rourke To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit > Medical prescriptions use a number of conventional Latin abbreviations, > such as t.i.d. for ter in die, understood as thrice daily. Given the > Roman use of inclusive numbering, wouldn't t.i.d. in fact really have > to mean what we would describe as twice daily? > AMK Nope. Inclusive counting would begin at the first dose, which would be 1, and end with third dose, which would be 3. .