From Reuben1024@aol.com Sun Mar 16 03:48:04 1997
Received: from mx2.u.washington.edu (mx2.u.washington.edu [140.142.32.7])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW96.12/8.8.4+UW97.03) with ESMTP
	  id DAA16478 for <failure@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 03:48:03 -0800
From: Reuben1024@aol.com
Received: from emout11.mail.aol.com (emout11.mx.aol.com [198.81.11.26])
          by mx2.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW96.12/8.8.4+UW97.03) with ESMTP
	  id BAA07353 for <failure@u.washington.edu>; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 01:54:48 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
	  by emout11.mail.aol.com (8.7.6/8.7.3/AOL-2.0.0)
	  id EAA16416 for failure@u.washington.edu;
	  Sun, 16 Mar 1997 04:53:33 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 04:53:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <970316045332_1318112959@emout11.mail.aol.com>
To: failure@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: To Reuben (addendum)

I'm not knocking those of you who dig the jackets, I'm just commenting on the
proliferation of Failure merchandise.  First it was shirts (which, by the
way, kick booty).  Then, I believe, someone mentioned hats.  Suddenly
everyone has jackets (I seriously missed something; I think I only read one
message from Marilyn).  Some of us prefer to be a little more subtle in our
support of Failure.  It doesn't mean I like them any less.

Reuben
.