From KlawNoomy@aol.com Sun Apr 19 17:03:30 1998
Received: from mxu4.u.washington.edu (mxu4.u.washington.edu [140.142.33.8])
          by lists.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.05) with ESMTP
	  id RAA19122 for <failure@lists.u.washington.edu>; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 17:03:29 -0700
Received: from imo28.mx.aol.com (imo28.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.72])
          by mxu4.u.washington.edu (8.8.4+UW97.07/8.8.4+UW97.09) with ESMTP
	  id RAA01605 for <failure@u.washington.edu>; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 17:03:28 -0700
Received: from KlawNoomy@aol.com
	by imo28.mx.aol.com (IMOv14.1) id 4MPIa27907
	for <failure@u.washington.edu>; Sun, 19 Apr 1998 20:03:18 +2000 (EDT)
From: Klaw Noomy <KlawNoomy@aol.com>
Message-ID: <1ac9bb18.353a90c7@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 20:03:18 EDT
To: failure@u.washington.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: another cool band
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 58

is that a bad band wagon?  I know its not originall (like failure) but they
sound good...but that's a personal opinion...

    dew
.