From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Tue Dec 19 11:36:27 2000 Return-Path: Received: by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 110) id 5FAAA17B76; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:36:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 6024) id 63C5617B79; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:36:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC8415E4 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:36:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: (from news@localhost) by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id LAA13600 for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:36:13 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to using -f From: "Romano AMODEO" X-Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics Subject: Interdisciplinary matter to help PHYSICS Lines: 97 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 11:36:07 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@libero.it X-Trace: news.infostrada.it 977225767 151.30.65.5 (Tue, 19 Dec 2000 12:36:07 MET) Organization: [Infostrada] To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Attention. To read www.new-is.com. is an important matter. Please, mathematicians, physicists, <>, in geometry, in <> and information technology... please, read it ! This is an interdisciplinary matter and your competence is needed to really help Physics! This web site proposes A.I.S. (Absolute I.S.), which is a New-I.S. that is based on absolute values and not on imprecise "weights and measurements". A.I.S. is the absolute ideal perfect reference system that is used by our human intelligence (as each intelligence, also the artificial one); if we choose the same system A.I.S. (instead of I.S.) to measure the nature, everything will result ideally as we conceive, we'll receive immense prizes>. Any lacunas and approximations (in the constant physical quantities and in everything) will be eliminated, Physics will be unified and a perfect numerical dimensional examination will be possible... It'll be enough the adoption of A.I.S.: absolute correction of I.S.. Possible? It is possible ! It is easy to be done ! When we have (lined up) N modular units, if we measure it in “A” or “B” or “C” different units, we have certainly different numbers. Among they all, the only convenient unit is the “m” unit that counts N through the same number N… and not another one ! Therefore IF WE DESIRE TO BE HELPED DIRECTLY BY NUMBERS we have to adopt that only “m unit” not exchanging the number (in way to receive direct information from the numbers, because in this situation they count ). IMPORTANT. Put attention to this count, which counts the unitary atomic masses of light, free to move, referred to the general space reference chosen by Physics, when I.S. was adopted…, that is referred to 1 m^3): Å10^10 = 1m. It is the length of 10^10 lined up cubes, one near the other. So they are also Å^3 10^10 = 1m. Å^3 10^-3 = 1 a.m.u. (atomic mass unit, volume meaning “weight”). Å10^10 * Å^3 10^-3 = Å^6 10^7 is the entire free movement of 1 a.m.u. in 1 m (unit reference of lenght). It is 1 a.m.u. of everything (also mass of “light”). Referring to 1 m^3, the freedom of 1 atomic mass of light in each (of its 3 components) is 1*10^7=100,000,000, and in all 3 components the freedom is 3*100,000,000 = 300,000,000. In this EXACT situation (if we desire a number helping our interpretative jobs) we must number 300,000,000 spaces (advanced by unit masses of light) through the number 300,000,000, and not the 299.792,458 that result using the “m unit” today used. Using the “today m” everything have IMPRECISE values, and rations between imprecise values are numbers having unlimited decimal values (It is the case of all physical constants). It is convenient matter to adopt a “new m” exactly dimensioned, in way to not exchange the number 300,000,000. Wen we’ll do in this convenient way, the same number will reveal how many “cubes” there are lined up, how many unit dimensions, and the PHYSICS is finally UNIFIED. It is so, because the E/m ratio (recognized equal to c^2 by Einstein) takes the ABSOLUTE ratio 9/1, as the 9 free unitary movements of 1 dm^3 of water (1 kg, unitary ABSOLUTE weight-mass reference) in its entire space-reference (10 dm equal to 1m). The entire (unit) freedom is: 10dm –1dm=9dm of energetic movement (Einstein’s “E”). The entire (unit) occupation of the unitary mass, in line, is 1dm (Einstein’s “m”). The unitary ratio E/m MUST BE 9dm/1dm=9/1 “pure number”… if we respect the definitions of the I.S. reference absolute system regarding the spatial shape (1 dm^3 of water, present in 1 m). In any representation of E/m ratio, if we do not put it as 9/1, we contradict the I.S. spatial shape definitive postulates. In any representation ! Also in the case in which we recur to speed vector of light. Because the light is the absolute actor of the translation of 1 cube into another one more advanced through time. THIS IS RIGHT: to extrapolate m by c, in way to not exchange the number 300,000,000 of the unit atomic masses of light. THIS IS WRONG: to extrapolate c by an “m unit” which is calculated through “weights and measurements” (always approximated entities). This is the enacted today… but IT IS WRONG: because in this way the “c number” takes into all the inaccuracy of “m, a measured unit”. WE HAVE TO INVERT THE DIRECTION of our proceeding, finally going from the GENERAL 9/1 towards the PARTICULAR “m unit” that the number 9 Finally the PHYSICS UNIFICATION ! Physics must be unified... we can do it. Why to do not? Thank you ! Romano AMODEO .