From owner-biophysics@net.bio.net Sat Dec 12 22:00:00 1998
Path: biosci!news.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!Supernews73!supernews.com!news.he.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!207.155.183.80.MISMATCH!global-news-master
From: kkollins@pop3.concentric.net
Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics,bionet.microbiology,bionet.neuroscience
Subject: Re: The truth is out there
Date: 12 Dec 1998 20:16:21 PST
Organization: sufficient
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <36733F0D.5BA589C9@pop3.concentric.net>
References: <73sh3s$1n2$2@news.tamu.edu> <912381406.6676.0.nnrp-04.d4e44203@news.demon.co.uk> <73t7tt$9kr$2@news.tamu.edu> <36635D8D.46F680BA@pop3.concentric.net> <740246$k24$1@news.tamu.edu> <913500941.7312.0.nnrp-04.d4e44203@news.demon.co.uk>
Reply-To: kkollins@concentric.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: ts002d05.spr-ma.concentric.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en]C-DIAL  (Win95; U)
Xref: biosci bionet.biophysics:4638 bionet.microbiology:15321 bionet.neuroscience:26484

Good for you, Andrew, the integration inherent in your Theory is
Quite-Nice. You can Verify your position be-cause, if it's Correct, the
"tube"-construction must be graded over the length of the tubes
(greatest where the tube is oldest, least where the tube is newest.) a
carefully cross-sectioned tree, a microscope, and the Will to do what'll
be a lengthy cross-correlation process are all you need.

I enjoyed reading your work. Cheers, Ken Collins

Andrews K Fletcher wrote:

[his Interesting Theoretical Position re. water flow in trees]

.