From owner-dros@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Mon Aug 6 14:05:21 2001 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971CA17A80 for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:05:16 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D572717A8F for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:04:54 +0100 (BST) Received: by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 6020) id 4013717A87; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:04:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473B817C0F for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:56:16 +0100 (BST) Received: by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 60001) id AC9FE17C0E; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:56:11 +0100 (BST) To: bionet-drosophila@net.bio.net From: cathy.slack@ic.ac.uk (Cathy Slack) Newsgroups: bionet.drosophila Subject: Embryo in situ problems Organization: BIOSCI/MRC Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre Message-ID: <3B6AD7ED.51E6A565@ic.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C5017C11 for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:56:08 +0100 (BST) X-Received: from mr3.cc.ic.ac.uk (mr3.cc.ic.ac.uk [155.198.5.113]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B727E17C0F for ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:56:04 +0100 (BST) X-Received: from icex9.cc.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.3.9]) by mr3.cc.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15ShIy-0000jy-00 for dros@net.bio.net; Fri, 03 Aug 2001 16:56:04 +0100 X-Received: from ic.ac.uk (dhm8.bc.ic.ac.uk [155.198.230.252]) by icex9.cc.ic.ac.uk with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id P4QC6NYA; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:56:04 +0100 X-Reply-To: cathy.slack@ic.ac.uk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en X-To: dros@net.bio.net Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 14:04:09 +0100 (BST) Sender: owner-dros@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk I have been having problems with in situ hybrisisation to embryos using DIG-labelled RNA probes. I basically see a lot of non-specific labelling and even see the probe hybridising to the nucleus! I don't think its my probe as different probes give the same result. Has anyone ever experienced this problem before and if so how do I rectify it??? I am basically following a standard in situ protocol. --- .