From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk  Thu Apr 22 02:50:05 2004
Return-Path: <owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: biophys-outgoing
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 504BC7D2D9
	for <biophys-outgoing>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:50:05 +0100 (BST)
X-Original-To: biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D237D2DC
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:50:04 +0100 (BST)
Received: from helium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (helium [193.62.192.2])
	by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5797D2EB
	for <biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk>; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:50:02 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by helium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.1/Submit) id i3M1o21j014929
	for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:50:02 +0100 (BST)
From: Bhadresh Rami <brami@stanford.edu>
X-Newsgroups: bionet.biophysics
Subject: immobilized pepsin columns
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:49:55 -0700
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404211847370.6894-100000@cardinal5.Stanford.EDU>
References: <200404201940.i3KJewo18096@vreme.yubc.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Complaints-To: news@news.stanford.edu
In-Reply-To: <200404201940.i3KJewo18096@vreme.yubc.net>
To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk


dear friends,

does anyone have experience with immobilized pepsin columns??

i need one to perform online digestion (pH 2.5, 0 C) followed by feeding
into the massspec for fragment analysis.

any input on the brand, quality, comparative efficiencies of these columns
will be very helpful...

thanks.

								- rami


.