From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Mon Apr 30 23:24:24 2001 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C85D17BB0 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:24:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C8417C13 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:24:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2B917BA7 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:18:13 +0100 (BST) Received: (from news@localhost) by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id XAA18564 for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 23:18:13 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to using -f Message-ID: <3AEDE686.D491671E@mediaone.net> From: George Hammond X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.physics,talk.atheism Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright References: <3AE9B280.8406B3B2@mediaone.net> <3AEADE18.6CDCEC04@mediaone.net> <3aeafab8.259537105@nntp.we.mediaone.net> <3AEB1B0F.5D8C32D3@mediaone.net> <3AEC8193.FA637652@mediaone.net> <3AEC80E6.B2458DB@hvc.rr.com> <3AEC975E.37157E09@mediaone.net> <3AECB09B.83C68B85@mindspring.com> <3AED2DAD.810FE326@mediaone.net> <1103_988647178@GANDALF> <3AED9F76.CDE10BD6@mediaone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 35 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 22:17:51 GMT X-Complaints-To: abuse@mediaone.net Organization: Road Runner To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk David Jensen wrote: snip > >[Hammond] > >There are no fallicies. Don't be an idiot, I'm a graduate physicist, > >I know what a scientific proof is and what it isn't... > > What's a scientific proof, I've never heard of that before. [Hammond] Definition of a Scientific Proof (Hammond) A scientific proof consists of a comprehensive, internally consistent theoretical explanation derivable from the axiomatic "Laws of Physics", and which, in addition, is overwhelmingly confirmed by direct experimental evidence. The scientific "Proof of Gawd" presented on my website, is EXACTLY such a run of the mill, standard, ordinary scientific proof. snip -- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html ----------------------------------------------------------- .