From owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sun Apr 29 18:17:43 2001 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9521017A67 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:17:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0065317AD5 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:17:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (niobium [193.62.192.41]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA40C17A67 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:17:37 +0100 (BST) Received: (from news@localhost) by niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.8.8) id SAA11397 for biophys-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:17:37 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: niobium.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk: news set sender to using -f From: Mr J R N Austin X-Newsgroups: alt.agnosticism,alt.astronomy,alt.atheism,alt.athiesm,alt.sci.natural.phenomena.unusual,alt.sci.physics,alt.talk.creationism,bionet.biophysics,harvard.course.physics11a.q-a,sci.bio.paleontology,sci.geo.geology,sci.physics,talk.atheism Subject: Re: The "Science" of John Boatwright Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:16:54 +0100 Organization: University of Warwick, UK Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <3ae7e476_2@news01.one.net.au> <3AEA0723.5EFFC08D@123jeff.com> <3AEA1617.C53B662B@mediaone.net> <3AEAE399.281C2E08@123jeff.com> <3AEB1E89.B89A0E6E@mediaone.net> <3aeb5a9a_4@news01.one.net.au> <280420012028267991%pww@mac.com> <3AEB733F.A0456D35@mediaone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Complaints-To: news@csv.warwick.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <3AEB733F.A0456D35@mediaone.net> X-X-Sender: mauyr@mail.csv.warwick.ac.uk To: biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Sender: owner-biophys@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, George Hammond wrote: > Peter Walker wrote: > > > > In article <3aeb5a9a_4@news01.one.net.au>, Clayton Forno < > > wrote: > > > > Piggybacking... > > > > >"George Hammond" wrote in message > > >news:3AEB1E89.B89A0E6E@mediaone.net... > > > > >> Please allow people of actual > > >> educational accomplishemnt to speak, IWO please shut up > > >> because you are boring the shit out of everybody. > > > > Wasn't this the jackass who denounced those with even greater > > educational accomplishment than he, because their degrees meant > > nothing? > > > > Just wondering how one reconciles the cognitive dissonance here. > > [Hammond] > The only cognitive dissonance here is between synchophantic > line professional academic whores like you who wouldn't know > God if you met him, or even a competent scientist for that > matter.... and a serious scientist like myself who is so > fed up with your hypocritical academic posturing and ritualistic > synchophantic nay saying he could puke. You guys couldn't find > your way home if you were lost in a park, much less understand > anything as sophisticated as Psychometry, General Relativity, and > God. Go correct some friggin papers or something and leave the > problem of 3 billion starving people to a real man like me. I've got a couple of loaves and some tinned sardines. You should be able to get the job done with that, eh? Jez. .