From owner-dros@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Fri Apr 11 14:35:39 2003 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dros-outgoing Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id E82707D3A1 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:35:38 +0100 (BST) X-Original-To: dros-list@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFA37D44C for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:35:38 +0100 (BST) Received: by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 6020) id 3F1EA7D3A1; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:35:37 +0100 (BST) Subject: No subject given X-Original-To: mod-dros@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB197D1CD for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:41:29 +0100 (BST) Received: from vagh.cc.utah.edu (vagh.ks.cc.utah.edu [155.99.1.103]) by mercury.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4837D0CB for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:41:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.0.0.223] (fw.biochem.utah.edu [155.101.144.53]) by vagh.cc.utah.edu (SMTP Mailer) with ESMTP id <0HD30051QAL11Z@vagh.cc.utah.edu> for mod-dros@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk; Wed, 09 Apr 2003 12:41:26 -0600 (MDT) From: Kelly Beumer X-Sender: kelly@mail.biochem.utah.edu To: mod-dros@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_85LyTUDCmEawZWYJ+ZCH8A)" Newsgroups: bionet.drosophila Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:35:37 +0100 (BST) Sender: owner-dros@hgmp.mrc.ac.uk Precedence: bulk --Boundary_(ID_85LyTUDCmEawZWYJ+ZCH8A) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi, Tony, I am thinking about making gateway vectors as well, and saw that Terry Murphy at the Carnegie institute has made a few that will be available to the community soon. Did you get any input on this note you posted last october on flybase? ref: news.indiana.edu bionet.drosophila:148 Fly gurus, We're wondering if there is any experience using p element transformation vectors (for example pUAST) made by gateway cloning (invitrogen). Is there any difference in expression or mobilization from a p-element having the 20-odd basepair recombination site internally in the polylinker? We are making p-element transformation plasmids this way, but would like to know if we are getting ourselves into trouble. Thanks, Thanks for lettling me know! -- Kelly Beumer Biochemistry Department University of Utah 20 N. 1900 East, Rm. 211 Salt Lake City , UT 84132-3201 1-801-581-3848 --Boundary_(ID_85LyTUDCmEawZWYJ+ZCH8A) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Hi, Tony,
I am thinking about making gateway vectors as well, and saw that Terry Murphy at the Carnegie institute has made a few that will be available to the community soon. Did you get any input on this note you posted last october on flybase?

ref: news.indiana.edu bionet.drosophila:148

Fly gurus,
        We're wondering if there is any experience using p element
transformation vectors (for example pUAST) made by gateway cloning
(invitrogen).   Is there any difference in expression or mobilization
from a p-element having the 20-odd basepair recombination site
internally in the polylinker?  We are making  p-element transformation
plasmids this way, but would like to know if we are getting ourselves
into trouble.

Thanks,

Thanks for lettling me know!

-- 
Kelly Beumer
Biochemistry Department
University of Utah
20 N. 1900 East, Rm. 211
Salt Lake City , UT 84132-3201

1-801-581-3848
--Boundary_(ID_85LyTUDCmEawZWYJ+ZCH8A)-- .